| Banter for Sunday 30 October | |
|
+38noeledmonds WILKSY hotshot66 Plough new boy THE WATCHER Reem Team FC Stroller BEES KNEES Fishandchips Mivan are going up Hairy Hebrew! NiffyA Paulo Joey Barton Giggsisgod Hellboy dezza Dodgy PEEWEE Number1 Widds The Plough greeeedy THE MAGICIAN wheel1 dave ash Polska legend II norty14 Throop Boss timmy mallet whiteeagles CSKA17 dan_mitchell_WRFC LCFCHOTSHOT Snash Fccol L.K.F.C Gordon 42 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Reem Team FC
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 2:30 pm | |
| Without trying to sound as though I'm bragging we ran riot yesterday at Gimbles. Nice bunch of lads but they really weren't at the races. Great performance by the referee, i'm starting to be surprised at the amount of very good refs at this level! Even though they scored three this flatters them, Beefs bless him wasn't feeling well at all but done the team proud again by dragging himself there. He missed a couple of ones he'd normally save with ease, and their player toe-poked one in from 25 yards top corner! Haha! Good performances all round from our lot on the smallest pitch I have EVER played on! (then again was nice to play a match that wasn't at home costing us money) lol Well done all the Alliance League teams- looks like we had the upper hand overall looking at the match reports | |
|
| |
BEES KNEES
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 2:38 pm | |
| - Stroller wrote:
- Half the story there Helly. They started with 10, had a man sent off at 1-0, we missed pen, 2 more lads turned up so played out game with 10. Probably played about 10 minutes versus 9.
Not our issue though that game going to be void then and replayed? | |
|
| |
THE WATCHER Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm | |
| - Stroller wrote:
- Theres a queue to fill hotshot66 in
should change his shirt number to 69 only way to keep him quiet! | |
|
| |
Stroller Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 5:13 pm | |
| - KAJI-MACHINE wrote:
- Stroller wrote:
- Half the story there Helly. They started with 10, had a man sent off at 1-0, we missed pen, 2 more lads turned up so played out game with 10. Probably played about 10 minutes versus 9.
Not our issue though
that game going to be void then and replayed? Why would it be??? They started with 10 but named 2 subs who were on their way to the ground They had a man sent off The 2 subs turned up They brought one on straight away to bring them back up to the allowed 10 players If you need anything else straight forward explaining let me know | |
|
| |
Hairy Hebrew! Division 1 Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 6:03 pm | |
| The hotshots press officer is finally here to clear it up.hope he does a better job than the last one :-P | |
|
| |
Number1
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 7:30 pm | |
| As a hotshots player I'm really confused what's gone on ? | |
|
| |
greeeedy Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 8:00 pm | |
| - Hellboy wrote:
- The firs old boys wrote:
- Hotshots 16-1 Firs
What can I say.. we got hammered! Great banter while we were playing, so never mind it's not all bad. Good bunch of lads at Hotshots and I'll be very surprised if they don't win div 6. All the best for the rest of the season. Forget about it, it will be an annulled score, on account of a substitution saga what happened which is illegal, i'm sure once iv'e had a word with the committee they will take the right action and, deduct them the appropriate points and fine them good and hard. slightly confused what exactly has meant to have happened ??? | |
|
| |
Number1
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 8:02 pm | |
| Same timmy, would like to know what's suppose to have happened? | |
|
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 8:14 pm | |
| Iv just had confirmation our dear friend hellboy is wrong. A firs ob substitution is a matter for their management and the referee | |
|
| |
Number1
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 8:22 pm | |
| Cheers for clearing up, everything seemed legit this weekend and every other, just a forum jobsworth trying to stir things up. | |
|
| |
Polska legend II Supreme Top Dog
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 8:28 pm | |
| - Hairy Hebrew! wrote:
- Can I jus say top refereeing performance from kev French yesterday. I no I was very unhappy with last weeks ref but had Mr French twice this season and both top performances
thats because he is a quality ref | |
|
| |
Polska legend II Supreme Top Dog
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 8:31 pm | |
| - timmy mallet wrote:
- Iv just had confirmation our dear friend hellboy is wrong. A firs ob substitution is a matter for their management and the referee
i cant quite believe Hellboy is wrong | |
|
| |
LCFCHOTSHOT
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 8:49 pm | |
| - Hellboy wrote:
- The firs old boys wrote:
- Hotshots 16-1 Firs
What can I say.. we got hammered! Great banter while we were playing, so never mind it's not all bad. Good bunch of lads at Hotshots and I'll be very surprised if they don't win div 6. All the best for the rest of the season. Forget about it, it will be an annulled score, on account of a substitution saga what happened which is illegal, i'm sure once iv'e had a word with the committee they will take the right action and, deduct them the appropriate points and fine them good and hard. Apparently it was them that made the sub so get your facts right. We did everything by the book. So you can crawl back to your hole now! | |
|
| |
Plough new boy Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Mon 31 Oct 2011, 9:53 pm | |
| Put them on zero points and one thousand pound fine for this despicable behaviour. hotshots that is, firs should get let off with a slapped wrist | |
|
| |
Stroller Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 8:43 am | |
| It wasn't hard to interpret the original post Stroller knows best | |
|
| |
hotshot66 Non-League Poster
| |
| |
BEES KNEES
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 10:33 am | |
| - Stroller wrote:
- KAJI-MACHINE wrote:
- Stroller wrote:
- Half the story there Helly. They started with 10, had a man sent off at 1-0, we missed pen, 2 more lads turned up so played out game with 10. Probably played about 10 minutes versus 9.
Not our issue though
that game going to be void then and replayed? Why would it be???
They started with 10 but named 2 subs who were on their way to the ground
They had a man sent off
The 2 subs turned up
They brought one on straight away to bring them back up to the allowed 10 players
If you need anything else straight forward explaining let me know well being as i wasnt at the game and people have conflicting stories how was i meant to know? | |
|
| |
Hellboy Supreme Top Dog
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 10:39 am | |
| - LCFCHOTSHOT wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- The firs old boys wrote:
- Hotshots 16-1 Firs
What can I say.. we got hammered! Great banter while we were playing, so never mind it's not all bad. Good bunch of lads at Hotshots and I'll be very surprised if they don't win div 6. All the best for the rest of the season. Forget about it, it will be an annulled score, on account of a substitution saga what happened which is illegal, i'm sure once iv'e had a word with the committee they will take the right action and, deduct them the appropriate points and fine them good and hard. Apparently it was them that made the sub so get your facts right. We did everything by the book. So you can crawl back to your hole now! You must be reading some invisible material, i have not said it was Hotspot that did the deed on any of my posts, i suggest you go back and read all that crap again and get your facts right buddy, in fact i wrote it didnt matter who did the wrong doings or what the score was, i mearly said its an illegal thing to do, so either you are a tad thick or you've got an overactive imagination, just another excuse to come on here, and have a pop at the top dog, so i suggest you sniff my choccy starfish and submit to the leader, go away and learn to read properly, and you might stand a chance of looking half intelligent. | |
|
| |
WILKSY
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 10:49 am | |
| - Hellboy wrote:
- LCFCHOTSHOT wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- The firs old boys wrote:
- Hotshots 16-1 Firs
What can I say.. we got hammered! Great banter while we were playing, so never mind it's not all bad. Good bunch of lads at Hotshots and I'll be very surprised if they don't win div 6. All the best for the rest of the season. Forget about it, it will be an annulled score, on account of a substitution saga what happened which is illegal, i'm sure once iv'e had a word with the committee they will take the right action and, deduct them the appropriate points and fine them good and hard. Apparently it was them that made the sub so get your facts right. We did everything by the book. So you can crawl back to your hole now!
You must be reading some invisible material, i have not said it was Hotspot that did the deed on any of my posts, i suggest you go back and read all that crap again and get your facts right buddy, in fact i wrote it didnt matter who did the wrong doings or what the score was, i mearly said its an illegal thing to do, so either you are a tad thick or you've got an overactive imagination, just another excuse to come on here, and have a pop at the top dog, so i suggest you sniff my choccy starfish and submit to the leader, go away and learn to read properly, and you might stand a chance of looking half intelligent. lol, u've been told | |
|
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:02 am | |
| - WILKSY wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- LCFCHOTSHOT wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- The firs old boys wrote:
- Hotshots 16-1 Firs
What can I say.. we got hammered! Great banter while we were playing, so never mind it's not all bad. Good bunch of lads at Hotshots and I'll be very surprised if they don't win div 6. All the best for the rest of the season. Forget about it, it will be an annulled score, on account of a substitution saga what happened which is illegal, i'm sure once iv'e had a word with the committee they will take the right action and, deduct them the appropriate points and fine them good and hard. Apparently it was them that made the sub so get your facts right. We did everything by the book. So you can crawl back to your hole now!
You must be reading some invisible material, i have not said it was Hotspot that did the deed on any of my posts, i suggest you go back and read all that crap again and get your facts right buddy, in fact i wrote it didnt matter who did the wrong doings or what the score was, i mearly said its an illegal thing to do, so either you are a tad thick or you've got an overactive imagination, just another excuse to come on here, and have a pop at the top dog, so i suggest you sniff my choccy starfish and submit to the leader, go away and learn to read properly, and you might stand a chance of looking half intelligent. lol, u've been told cmon wilksy dont u jump on the bandwagon aswell!!! all these haters hating, we love it, we feed off it! just keep it coming hellboy, your inadvertently spurring us on me old mucka!!! we smashed firs to bits in reply to what happened last week, all the lads where disssapointed of our 1-0 defeat but we rallied an showed what we are capable of!!!! like i said in the other thread the only team i feel a threat to us are npe, 3 games, 3 draws plus they are so far unbeaten but they still must win those games in hand! it seems wheel think npe are in with no chance at all as he hasnt named them in his top 3 but has included the wheel lol that did make me chuckle | |
|
| |
WILKSY
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:21 am | |
| - timmy mallet wrote:
- WILKSY wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- LCFCHOTSHOT wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- The firs old boys wrote:
- Hotshots 16-1 Firs
What can I say.. we got hammered! Great banter while we were playing, so never mind it's not all bad. Good bunch of lads at Hotshots and I'll be very surprised if they don't win div 6. All the best for the rest of the season. Forget about it, it will be an annulled score, on account of a substitution saga what happened which is illegal, i'm sure once iv'e had a word with the committee they will take the right action and, deduct them the appropriate points and fine them good and hard. Apparently it was them that made the sub so get your facts right. We did everything by the book. So you can crawl back to your hole now!
You must be reading some invisible material, i have not said it was Hotspot that did the deed on any of my posts, i suggest you go back and read all that crap again and get your facts right buddy, in fact i wrote it didnt matter who did the wrong doings or what the score was, i mearly said its an illegal thing to do, so either you are a tad thick or you've got an overactive imagination, just another excuse to come on here, and have a pop at the top dog, so i suggest you sniff my choccy starfish and submit to the leader, go away and learn to read properly, and you might stand a chance of looking half intelligent. lol, u've been told cmon wilksy dont u jump on the bandwagon aswell!!! all these haters hating, we love it, we feed off it! just keep it coming hellboy, your inadvertently spurring us on me old mucka!!! we smashed firs to bits in reply to what happened last week, all the lads where disssapointed of our 1-0 defeat but we rallied an showed what we are capable of!!!! like i said in the other thread the only team i feel a threat to us are npe, 3 games, 3 draws plus they are so far unbeaten but they still must win those games in hand! it seems wheel think npe are in with no chance at all as he hasnt named them in his top 3 but has included the wheel lol that did make me chuckle just made me laugh reading hellys reply, think its alot tighter up there in our div this year to b honest and if u guys get some kinda punishment for this then there will be bout 5 teams rubbing there hands together. all the pressure is on us to win our games in hand especially this week as afc royal oak could be up there else. from wat i gather from this u guys didnt really do much wrong but might see if gordon wants a back hander to dock u 3 points. think ur goal difference says it all but if it gets replayed i bet u'll struggle to get 16 again. | |
|
| |
hotshot66 Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:28 am | |
| - WILKSY wrote:
- timmy mallet wrote:
- WILKSY wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- LCFCHOTSHOT wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- The firs old boys wrote:
- Hotshots 16-1 Firs
What can I say.. we got hammered! Great banter while we were playing, so never mind it's not all bad. Good bunch of lads at Hotshots and I'll be very surprised if they don't win div 6. All the best for the rest of the season. Forget about it, it will be an annulled score, on account of a substitution saga what happened which is illegal, i'm sure once iv'e had a word with the committee they will take the right action and, deduct them the appropriate points and fine them good and hard. Apparently it was them that made the sub so get your facts right. We did everything by the book. So you can crawl back to your hole now!
You must be reading some invisible material, i have not said it was Hotspot that did the deed on any of my posts, i suggest you go back and read all that crap again and get your facts right buddy, in fact i wrote it didnt matter who did the wrong doings or what the score was, i mearly said its an illegal thing to do, so either you are a tad thick or you've got an overactive imagination, just another excuse to come on here, and have a pop at the top dog, so i suggest you sniff my choccy starfish and submit to the leader, go away and learn to read properly, and you might stand a chance of looking half intelligent. lol, u've been told cmon wilksy dont u jump on the bandwagon aswell!!! all these haters hating, we love it, we feed off it! just keep it coming hellboy, your inadvertently spurring us on me old mucka!!! we smashed firs to bits in reply to what happened last week, all the lads where disssapointed of our 1-0 defeat but we rallied an showed what we are capable of!!!! like i said in the other thread the only team i feel a threat to us are npe, 3 games, 3 draws plus they are so far unbeaten but they still must win those games in hand! it seems wheel think npe are in with no chance at all as he hasnt named them in his top 3 but has included the wheel lol that did make me chuckle just made me laugh reading hellys reply, think its alot tighter up there in our div this year to b honest and if u guys get some kinda punishment for this then there will be bout 5 teams rubbing there hands together. all the pressure is on us to win our games in hand especially this week as afc royal oak could be up there else. from wat i gather from this u guys didnt really do much wrong but might see if gordon wants a back hander to dock u 3 points. think ur goal difference says it all but if it gets replayed i bet u'll struggle to get 16 again. if we had the same team out i would have to disagree, between their flag happy linesman and our missed chances it could have easily been 20-25. i don't think many firs players would disagree with that either! | |
|
| |
WILKSY
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:31 am | |
| bet we struggle against them | |
|
| |
hotshot66 Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:33 am | |
| well we lost to the wheel the week before who are no better funny old game! | |
|
| |
Fishandchips Division 2 Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:38 am | |
| Think your being a bit hard on the Wheel there, or did having Ash back this week make that bigger difference? | |
|
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:41 am | |
| - WILKSY wrote:
- bet we struggle against them
cant see it myself but no matter the outcome those lads are a very good bunch, after going 5-6 goals behind they just kept going an trying again whereas most teams would start kicking out they jus got on with it. i still strongly believe its between hotshots npe and pollards. we have sorted this sub issuse through the proper channels and we are not held responsible for anything their team or the ref does. 16 goals is alot to score in any game. if they put firs in front of us again i think we would defo beat em, scoreline might not be as high but none of that matters as this result stands. | |
|
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:42 am | |
| - Fishandchips wrote:
- Think your being a bit hard on the Wheel there, or did having Ash back this week make that bigger difference?
against the wheel we missed ash, dave rodgers, grant mccarthy! all three very influential midfielders | |
|
| |
THE WATCHER Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:42 am | |
| - hotshot66 wrote:
- well we lost to the wheel the week before who are no better
funny old game! oh no don't start wheel1 off again! wilksys right though it's never easy to score 16 whoever you play altough to be fair there should never be a points deduction for hotshots for what happened | |
|
| |
Fishandchips Division 2 Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:48 am | |
| - timmy mallet wrote:
- Fishandchips wrote:
- Think your being a bit hard on the Wheel there, or did having Ash back this week make that bigger difference?
against the wheel we missed ash, dave rodgers, grant mccarthy! all three very influential midfielders Fair enough, didn't know Rogers and Grant were missing too, did you have any central midfielders? | |
|
| |
hotshot66 Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 11:50 am | |
| - Fishandchips wrote:
- timmy mallet wrote:
- Fishandchips wrote:
- Think your being a bit hard on the Wheel there, or did having Ash back this week make that bigger difference?
against the wheel we missed ash, dave rodgers, grant mccarthy! all three very influential midfielders Fair enough, didn't know Rogers and Grant were missing too, did you have any central midfielders?
we had a striker and a right back playing centre mid that game | |
|
| |
Gordon Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm | |
| - wheel1 wrote:
- Hellboy wrote:
- The firs old boys wrote:
- Hotshots 16-1 Firs
What can I say.. we got hammered! Great banter while we were playing, so never mind it's not all bad. Good bunch of lads at Hotshots and I'll be very surprised if they don't win div 6. All the best for the rest of the season. Forget about it, it will be an annulled score, on account of a substitution saga what happened which is illegal, i'm sure once iv'e had a word with the committee they will take the right action and, deduct them the appropriate points and fine them good and hard. No wonder they are top of the league I expect the league to come down hard on them as that is just a blatant disregard of league rules you just can't get away with that it's disgusting!!!! It is actually a breach of the Laws of Association Football - Law 3 - Number of Players | |
|
| |
Gordon Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 12:20 pm | |
| - KAJI-MACHINE wrote:
- Stroller wrote:
- Half the story there Helly. They started with 10, had a man sent off at 1-0, we missed pen, 2 more lads turned up so played out game with 10. Probably played about 10 minutes versus 9.
Not our issue though
that game going to be void then and replayed? No reason to - Referee should report the Incomplete Team at kick off to County FA - but that will be a financial penalty. | |
|
| |
wheel1
| |
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 12:33 pm | |
| thankyou for clearing this mess up gordon, its amazing how quick people are to ask for penaltys to be dished out. especially when your winning. | |
|
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 12:34 pm | |
| npe will upset your applecart lad!!! | |
|
| |
hotshot66 Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 12:37 pm | |
| - wheel1 wrote:
- Fishandchips wrote:
- timmy mallet wrote:
- Fishandchips wrote:
- Think your being a bit hard on the Wheel there, or did having Ash back this week make that bigger difference?
against the wheel we missed ash, dave rodgers, grant mccarthy! all three very influential midfielders Fair enough, didn't know Rogers and Grant were missing too, did you have any central midfielders?
Excuses excuses we had atleast 5 first teamers out against hotshots and pollards beat hotshots 1-0 drew against pollards 4-4 after being 3-0 down to 3 pennos should have won it to be fair so we can't be that bad four points off the so called big two in the league with us down to bare bones both games says it all to me I really don't think u should right us off but that's upto you!!!! let me just stop you right there buddy, we aint played pollards yet. not the first time in this thread you have let your little imagination go running off without having the slightest clue what you are talking about. and the person you are saying "excuses excuses" to, isn't part of hotshots and admits himself he does not like hotshots!! | |
|
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Fishandchips Division 2 Poster
| |
| |
timmy mallet Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October Tue 01 Nov 2011, 12:54 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Banter for Sunday 30 October | |
| |
|
| |
| Banter for Sunday 30 October | |
|