Banter for 22nd November

Individual mistakes all over the park.

dee_aitcho wrote:

Individual mistakes all over the park.

believe me theres alot more to it than that.

You back running Bees Knees Bushy?

ben wrote:

Dee, I have stuck at it for 4 or 5 weeks, nothing is improving or getting better.

This kind of attitude makes me sick. 4 or 5 weeks you've had to put up with it, poor you

Have some respect for your team mates and manager and speak to them about it rather than coming on here and playing the sympathy card.

It's bad enough when superstar prima donna's behave like this, but substandard goalkeepers should be more appreciative of getting a game.

Rant over....

...for now

Bit harsh Doc, who's to say he has expressed his dismay to the team?

We don't no the circumstances.

I've always believed -Goalkeepers are the most important player on the pitch.

dee_aitcho wrote:

Bit harsh Doc, who's to say he has expressed his dismay to the team?

We don't no the circumstances.

I've always believed -Goalkeepers are the most important player on the pitch.

Maybe harsh, maybe not. If i was another Horse player reading the stuff he's put on here over the past couple of games, i'd tell him to 'sling his hook' or maybe something a little harsher.

Goalkeepers are very important, but not ones that come on public forums putting down the efforts of his team mates.

Hood Park Rangers 4

Nick Boyes 15" 88"
John Snashall 28"
Paul Gordon pen 37"

Little Bowden 1
Player 52"

Great win for us, long overdue as many will probably agree. Really good performance, had a sticky patch just after half time where we were on the ropes but we stuck it out and missed a penalty and a good one-on-one chance in the last few minutes... then our new right winger sealed it by slotting home a loose ball after a good save from their goalie.

HOOD PARK FOREVER!

Congrats Ivan on the win. Persistance does c*** for something!!

following on from last weeks capitulation at the hands of fengate (9 men) losing 6-4 this week we couldn't get any worse........could we....well going 1 nil down equalising 20 secs later then 3-1 down only to be leading 4-3 at half time.10 mins into the second half losing 6-4 come on keep with it then 7-4 only to pull it out the bag in the last minute 7-7.the ref ali barbarbar then produced 3 yeah 3 red cards after the game had finished.Player A & B both got booked in the game,player A was told to be quite after mouthing at the ref only to tell him to f off while ali was trying to get the cards out player B tried to stop him from producing them to which the ref shown him the red as well.After all this happened the lino then threw the flag either down or at the ref to which he was shown a red i think.

All in all a nice quiet sunday morning football game


Beaumont Town 2009 7-7 Throops

Anstey Hounds 4 - 1 Birstall Rangers

- Nathan Baker 2
- Neil Brewin
- Shane Jackson

Great result from the boys considering the number of players missing still..... onto 4th choice keeper today!!!
New signing Nathan looked usefull from what i've been told, will be interesting to see how the the Baker/Ladkin partnership looks when Joe returns from injury although be nice to get Staff, Anton, Greenie and Baxter back as well!
Things looking good for the Hounds, players coming back, nice run of games before christmas and Neil bagging 3 in 2 games!!!!
Its a strange season so far!!!!

Desford Utd 0 - 2 Magna Town

Leon Blaber
Elliot Newton

Awful in front of goal yesterday really shud have been a lot more IMO. Thanks to Desford, good set of lads with some quality food provided after!!

Webbys 2-1 Great Wigston

We were unlucky had the chances to go 3-0 up but wasted them, webbys defended very well and i enjoyed the game, it was our best performance in weeks and think we were unlucky not to have won the game, just poor finishing that killed us really, good display though and good headed goal by our new signing jay oliver, humberstone nxt week we will keep going and hope to put in display similar to yesterday

Minty wrote:

wafc wrote:

Rutland boy wrote:

Exeter Arms 6 AFC Beaumont 2

Thomas 2
Laughton 2
O'neill
Keogh

Looked good and passed it about well, particularly first half. Wind made it hard second half and we took our foot off a bit. Signs good though and look forward to getting 3 regular lads back for Fosse City game. Are AFC Beaumont sponsored by 'Deep Heat'?

find that a bit hard to beleive as we have played afc about 6 times now and i would never put them down as a side that use intimidation or violence. always found them a good bunch who enjoy a good bit of banter but nothing more!

some people dont know when to shut up. mouthiest side we have ever played against by a mile, from the first minute. some of the stuff that provoked us wasnt very clever to be honest so im not surprised a few of your lads took whacks. 99.9% of the time i wouldnt defend some of the tackles that went in, but today i understand why they did.

you will get a warm welcome in the return fixture

definate

Div 1 table after sundays results

No. Team P W D L F A GD Pts
1. Magna 73 Rangers 8 8 0 0 34 8 26 24
2. Sparta Moshdock 8 5 1 2 29 19 10 16
3. Welford Victoria 8 5 1 2 21 16 5 16
4. Glen Parva 7 5 0 2 35 21 14 15
5. AFC Hurricanes 9 4 0 5 24 18 6 12
6. Frolesworth United 8 3 2 3 29 27 2 11
7. Trinity Old Boys 9 3 2 4 24 34 -10 11
8. Cleansing Services 7 3 1 3 19 23 -4 10
9. Shakespeare Inn 9 3 0 6 25 27 -2 9
10. White Lion 9 2 1 6 15 27 -12 7
11. Horse 8 2 0 6 23 38 -15 6
12. Leicester Academicals 8 2 0 6 10 30 -20 6

dee_aitcho wrote:

You back running Bees Knees Bushy?

No mate not involved that side of things at the mo, just helping out as a player when needed

TAURUS wrote:

Wigston United 5 Premier Sports 7

Wigston took the lead after 2 minutes and then scored again 4 minutes later,only to be disallowed by the linesman for offside.Further attacks took place and several one on ones resulted in him flagging again and again for offside.This had a demoralising effect on the Wigston players and caused the referee Mark Lever to totally ignore him for much of the rest of the game.However the damage was already done and at half time it was a 7-2 advantage to Premier Sports.
In a totallly different second half it was Wigston who dominated it,and they had numerous chances to level the game,but only managed to score 3 more goals to end in a final result of 5-7.
No gripes about the Premier lads only the linesman.Other teams be aware.

think other teams know well every team is aware they cheat like f u c k but they only way to beat it is by ref seeing it,
when simon gaffer does it pretty good fair but everybody gives the odd one off which is tight but the bloke who i seen doing it gives umm of when theve cleary ran through

So due to a suspect linesman flagging their attacks Wigston conceded 7 in the 1st half, hows that work then

Watched the game between Countesthorpe and AC and a bit surprised by the match report, can only realy remember AC threatening from a couple of corners but seem to remember Countesthorpe missing a one on one and having what appeared to be a legal goal chalked off. Good game to watch with the better team coming out on top after all I dont think 5 - 1 happens by luck.

TAURUS wrote:

Wigston United 5 Premier Sports 7

Wigston took the lead after 2 minutes and then scored again 4 minutes later,only to be disallowed by the linesman for offside.Further attacks took place and several one on ones resulted in him flagging again and again for offside.This had a demoralising effect on the Wigston players and caused the referee Mark Lever to totally ignore him for much of the rest of the game.However the damage was already done and at half time it was a 7-2 advantage to Premier Sports.
In a totallly different second half it was Wigston who dominated it,and they had numerous chances to level the game,but only managed to score 3 more goals to end in a final result of 5-7.
No gripes about the Premier lads only the linesman.Other teams be aware.

This level of football will never be fair, or a true and proper game, because you havent got official lino's and never will have.

I thought that all premier games (or at least the majority) wheer going to have official assistant referees this season

Magna 73 Sec wrote:

I thought that all premier games (or at least the majority) wheer going to have official assistant referees this season

There are one or maybe two games with assistants each week but it is umpredictable.

wafc wrote:

Rutland boy wrote:

Exeter Arms 6 AFC Beaumont 2

Thomas 2
Laughton 2
O'neill
Keogh

Looked good and passed it about well, particularly first half. Wind made it hard second half and we took our foot off a bit. Signs good though and look forward to getting 3 regular lads back for Fosse City game. Are AFC Beaumont sponsored by 'Deep Heat'?

find that a bit hard to beleive as we have played afc about 6 times now and i would never put them down as a side that use intimidation or violence. always found them a good bunch who enjoy a good bit of banter but nothing more!

Two lads carrying bad knocks and one in casualty with broken wrist. Plan B I think.

dumb wrote:

Minty wrote:

wafc wrote:

Rutland boy wrote:

Exeter Arms 6 AFC Beaumont 2

Thomas 2
Laughton 2
O'neill
Keogh

Looked good and passed it about well, particularly first half. Wind made it hard second half and we took our foot off a bit. Signs good though and look forward to getting 3 regular lads back for Fosse City game. Are AFC Beaumont sponsored by 'Deep Heat'?

find that a bit hard to beleive as we have played afc about 6 times now and i would never put them down as a side that use intimidation or violence. always found them a good bunch who enjoy a good bit of banter but nothing more!

some people dont know when to shut up. mouthiest side we have ever played against by a mile, from the first minute. some of the stuff that provoked us wasnt very clever to be honest so im not surprised a few of your lads took whacks. 99.9% of the time i wouldnt defend some of the tackles that went in, but today i understand why they did.

you will get a warm welcome in the return fixture

definate

Yeah, yeah, we'll see about that

well by the sounds of things your boys mouths were writing cheques there bodys c*** cash!! might be time to keep the silly slobber down and save getting kicked up in the air!!
like i say my boys have played the afc lads many times without a problem so i would have thought you lot did something to stir up the reaction!!

Yeah, we scored a lot, I am not defending the moaning and to be honest, childish attitude of some of my players, particularly yesterday. I agree that two of them in particular would not last 5 minutes on a night out. But two or three challenges were out of order. We all have to work for a living afterall, just by luck we got away with one broken wrist. Didn't say they weren't a good bunch of lads. I'm off now to pick up all the spat dummies

wafc wrote:

well by the sounds of things your boys mouths were writing cheques there bodys c*** cash!! might be time to keep the silly slobber down and save getting kicked up in the air!!
like i say my boys have played the afc lads many times without a problem so i would have thought you lot did something to stir up the reaction!!

You're a Top Gun kind of guy aren't you Mr WAFC??!! Love it!!

sure am lodge.
want to be my wing man?

Ripple The Net wrote:

Watched the game between Countesthorpe and AC and a bit surprised by the match report, can only realy remember AC threatening from a couple of corners but seem to remember Countesthorpe missing a one on one and having what appeared to be a legal goal chalked off. Good game to watch with the better team coming out on top after all I dont think 5 - 1 happens by luck.

Can see why the royals never lasted in the prem, give it out but could'nt take it. im still very annoyed with the game yesterday, we were total shite an the better team on the day won true, hopefully we can give a better account of ourselves at our place as i really dont think the royals will be in the title race. as for ac we wont either if we dont pick ourselves up, must win game sunday!

fozzi wrote:

Ripple The Net wrote:

Watched the game between Countesthorpe and AC and a bit surprised by the match report, can only realy remember AC threatening from a couple of corners but seem to remember Countesthorpe missing a one on one and having what appeared to be a legal goal chalked off. Good game to watch with the better team coming out on top after all I dont think 5 - 1 happens by luck.

Can also see why the royals never lasted in the prem, give it out but could'nt take it. im still very annoyed with the game yesterday, we were total shite an the better team on the day won true, hopefully we can give a better account of ourselves at our place as i really dont think the royals will be in the title race. as for ac we wont either if we dont pick ourselves up, must win game sunday!

The referee was the same for both sides and as far as I know its been a long time since the Royals were in the prem and having read Retro Royals note that they had 6 players who started the week before away would only appear to paint AC as a poorer team than I thought. As for giving it out I thought it was an AC player who got booked for a two footed tackle on the Countesthorpe captain who if I remember correct jumped up and got on with the game. The phrase people who live in glass houses shoudnt throw stones

Ripple The Net wrote:

fozzi wrote:

Ripple The Net wrote:

Watched the game between Countesthorpe and AC and a bit surprised by the match report, can only realy remember AC threatening from a couple of corners but seem to remember Countesthorpe missing a one on one and having what appeared to be a legal goal chalked off. Good game to watch with the better team coming out on top after all I dont think 5 - 1 happens by luck.

Can also see why the royals never lasted in the prem, give it out but could'nt take it. im still very annoyed with the game yesterday, we were total shite an the better team on the day won true, hopefully we can give a better account of ourselves at our place as i really dont think the royals will be in the title race. as for ac we wont either if we dont pick ourselves up, must win game sunday!

The referee was the same for both sides and as far as I know its been a long time since the Royals were in the prem and having read Retro Royals note that they had 6 players who started the week before away would only appear to paint AC as a poorer team than I thought. As for giving it out I thought it was an AC player who got booked for a two footed tackle on the Countesthorpe captain who if I remember correct jumped up and got on with the game. The phrase people who live in glass houses shoudnt throw stones

we had four out. remind me what did there captain get booked for? phrase for you, dont shoot the gun and ask questions later. ac are a poor team? would love to compare them to yours but you'll just hide behind your "ripple the net"

fozzi wrote:

Ripple The Net wrote:

fozzi wrote:

Ripple The Net wrote:

Watched the game between Countesthorpe and AC and a bit surprised by the match report, can only realy remember AC threatening from a couple of corners but seem to remember Countesthorpe missing a one on one and having what appeared to be a legal goal chalked off. Good game to watch with the better team coming out on top after all I dont think 5 - 1 happens by luck.

Can also see why the royals never lasted in the prem, give it out but could'nt take it. im still very annoyed with the game yesterday, we were total shite an the better team on the day won true, hopefully we can give a better account of ourselves at our place as i really dont think the royals will be in the title race. as for ac we wont either if we dont pick ourselves up, must win game sunday!

The referee was the same for both sides and as far as I know its been a long time since the Royals were in the prem and having read Retro Royals note that they had 6 players who started the week before away would only appear to paint AC as a poorer team than I thought. As for giving it out I thought it was an AC player who got booked for a two footed tackle on the Countesthorpe captain who if I remember correct jumped up and got on with the game. The phrase people who live in glass houses shoudnt throw stones

we had four out. remind me what did there captain get booked for? phrase for you, dont shoot the gun and ask questions later. ac are a poor team? would love to compare them to yours but you'll just hide behind your "ripple the net"

4 out 6 dont think it matters too much. AC came with a big hype failed to live up to that billing. Didnt think their skipper got booked but I will bow to your superior knowledge on that one. Tried to point out that the match report was a little one sided as I said no mention of disallowed goal , your keeper making 5 excellent saves and the fact that the Countesthorpe sub came on and scored 2 what would have happened if he had started ? But I did say it was a good match to watch due to the fact that AC ok going forward poor at the back Countesthorpe stood out as more of a team

Never hyped up our selves, all from other people.

Thanks

Oh and two footed tackle?

Get a grip!!!

I thought it was a good fair game and agree that the ref was poor!!! How can you say we can give but cannot take? We like everyone else play to win, the nature of football is to be competative. And as for ruling out a teams title chances after beating the top team with 6-7 players away, thats just ridiculous.

Anyway good game that i thought was played in the right spirit. All the best for the rest of the season AC.

Royal Original wrote:

I thought it was a good fair game and agree that the ref was poor!!! How can you say we can give but cannot take? We like everyone else play to win, the nature of football is to be competative. And as for ruling out a teams title chances after beating the top team with 6-7 players away, thats just ridiculous.

Anyway good game that i thought was played in the right spirit. All the best for the rest of the season AC.

the moaning that your players did everytime you went down was ridiculous yet when the boots on the other foot it becomes a "mans game" funny that. everyone has players away each week so no need to keep going on about it its sunday football. you deserved the victory, one team contest and thats what makes it more dissapointing for us, we will see you again royals.

Same to you mate, great spirit of the game, didnt really see much of the niggly tackles or the "two footed tackle" which some one stated.

Thought both teams gave a great game.

See you at our ground.

Good bit of sportsmanship appears not to have been mentioned from the Sporting Wigston v Fosse game - Fosse kicking the ball back to the Sporting keeper after a drop ball - Dean caught it too well and it flew in over the keeper's head. Fosse then allowed Nath Williams to walk in a goal straight from kick off to cancel it out.

Very competative game, frustrating to watch I have to say. Well done Sporting.