| kajima v st marks | |
|
+13WILKSY Stroller ShaNiO Widds Jwithers rocket ledge Fishandchips Neevsey Gordon Polska legend II Sparta3 Aussie Owl BEES KNEES 17 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
BEES KNEES
| Subject: kajima v st marks Mon 14 Nov 2011, 1:58 pm | |
| am i right in saying that our county cup game against st marks is no longer happening and we now have NPE?? | |
|
| |
Aussie Owl Super Premier Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Mon 14 Nov 2011, 4:14 pm | |
| - KAJI-MACHINE wrote:
- am i right in saying that our county cup game against st marks is no longer happening and we now have NPE??
Yes | |
|
| |
BEES KNEES
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Mon 14 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm | |
| any particular reason for this? | |
|
| |
Sparta3 Division 2 Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Mon 14 Nov 2011, 4:27 pm | |
| Looks like St Marks have been booted out. Have they been naughty boys? | |
|
| |
BEES KNEES
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Mon 14 Nov 2011, 4:36 pm | |
| a few might have coursework to get done you never know??!!haha | |
|
| |
Aussie Owl Super Premier Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Mon 14 Nov 2011, 6:52 pm | |
| - Sparta3 wrote:
- Looks like St Marks have been booted out. Have they been naughty boys?
Played a player who had not been registered by the Thursday before the game. | |
|
| |
Polska legend II Supreme Top Dog
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Mon 14 Nov 2011, 6:57 pm | |
| shows the importance of following the rules - daft to get thrown out for a reason like that | |
|
| |
Sparta3 Division 2 Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Mon 14 Nov 2011, 7:03 pm | |
| Any league games affected Dennis? | |
|
| |
Gordon Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 8:48 am | |
| Yes - the scheduled D6 fixture - NPE v Pollards Crusaders on 4 December will need to be postponed to allow priority to County Competitions.
I am sure James will look at D5 and determine whether St Marks can get a fixture. | |
|
| |
Neevsey
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 11:10 am | |
| did St Marks beat NPE and if so what was the score anybody please | |
|
| |
Sparta3 Division 2 Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 11:30 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Gordon Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 11:31 am | |
| St Marks 3 NPE 1 was the result, but St Marks were subsequently removed (by County FA) from the Competition for fielding an Unregistered Player | |
|
| |
Fishandchips Division 2 Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 11:33 am | |
| Does that mean NPE get re-instated or just a bye for someone in the next round? | |
|
| |
rocket ledge Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 11:59 am | |
| Does that mean NPE get re-instated or just a bye for someone in the next round?
am i right in saying that our county cup game against st marks is no longer happening and we now have NPE??
i think your question was answered on the very 1st post | |
|
| |
Fishandchips Division 2 Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 12:03 pm | |
| should have read the whole thing properly | |
|
| |
Aussie Owl Super Premier Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm | |
| - Sparta3 wrote:
- Any league games affected Dennis?
No | |
|
| |
Aussie Owl Super Premier Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 4:01 pm | |
| - rocket ledge wrote:
- Does that mean NPE get re-instated or just a bye for someone in the next round?
am i right in saying that our county cup game against st marks is no longer happening and we now have NPE??
i think your question was answered on the very 1st post NPE reinstated | |
|
| |
Jwithers
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 6:05 pm | |
| NPE's manager signed the orange form and said it would be alright..... we are a new team and so is are secutary we did not no we would be kicked out for it :s | |
|
| |
Widds Top Dog
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 7:30 pm | |
| can you sign a player on the morning of an ew fosters game? | |
|
| |
Polska legend II Supreme Top Dog
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 8:16 pm | |
| without double checking the rules - I'd say probably but please check!
Although I am certain that if he has played in any other AL Cup competition this season (such as Arthur Moore etc) then he will be cup tied | |
|
| |
Gordon Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 11:56 pm | |
| - Widds wrote:
- can you sign a player on the morning of an ew fosters game?
Yes - the EW Foster Cup is an Alliance competition - so the usual maximum of 3 players on the morning, countersigned by your opponents. As always, ensure they are not suspended - or many ££££ to County FA It is a County Competition Rule that players must be registered by midnight Thursday, prior to a Sunday County Competition game. | |
|
| |
Gordon Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Tue 15 Nov 2011, 11:58 pm | |
| - Polska legend II wrote:
- without double checking the rules - I'd say probably but please check!
Although I am certain that if he has played in any other AL Cup competition this season (such as Arthur Moore etc) then he will be cup tied They would not be able to sign a player prior to a game who has appeared in another Alliance Cup Competition - that player would require a transfer from his existing club. | |
|
| |
Widds Top Dog
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Wed 16 Nov 2011, 7:46 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Polska legend II Supreme Top Dog
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Wed 16 Nov 2011, 7:57 am | |
| - Gordon wrote:
- Polska legend II wrote:
- without double checking the rules - I'd say probably but please check!
Although I am certain that if he has played in any other AL Cup competition this season (such as Arthur Moore etc) then he will be cup tied They would not be able to sign a player prior to a game who has appeared in another Alliance Cup Competition - that player would require a transfer from his existing club. So if the transfer went through a week before would he be able 2 play or would he be cup tied? | |
|
| |
ShaNiO
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Wed 16 Nov 2011, 8:56 am | |
| - KAJI-MACHINE wrote:
- a few might have coursework to get done you never know??!!haha
we shall see at the end of the season when your looking up the table at us | |
|
| |
Fishandchips Division 2 Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Wed 16 Nov 2011, 9:02 am | |
| - Polska legend II wrote:
- Gordon wrote:
- Polska legend II wrote:
- without double checking the rules - I'd say probably but please check!
Although I am certain that if he has played in any other AL Cup competition this season (such as Arthur Moore etc) then he will be cup tied They would not be able to sign a player prior to a game who has appeared in another Alliance Cup Competition - that player would require a transfer from his existing club. So if the transfer went through a week before would he be able 2 play or would he be cup tied? Would he not only be cup tied if he had played in the EW Fosters cup for someone else? as there have been no games so far wouldn't he be clear to play and only cup tied in the cups where he has represented someone else? | |
|
| |
Gordon Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Wed 16 Nov 2011, 9:37 am | |
| If he had played for the club he was leaving in the Bill Walton Cup he would be cuptied and cannot play for his new club in that competition,
If he had played for the club he was leaving in the Arthur Moore, EW Foster Cup, or Stokes he would be cuptied and cannot play for his new club in any of those competitions.
If he hasn't played for the club he was leaving in a cup competition he is not cup tied and therefore eligible to play.
A player signing immediately prior to a game, must be a newly registered player in the League and cannot possibly be cup tied - players only change clubs by transfer.
However - an exception
Going even deeper - I suppose a situation could arise where a player was signed on prior to a game who previously played for a club which had resigned with the player clearing his share of any debt and therefore having his registration with the resigned club cancelled. He could sign for a new club prior to a game (not a transfer in this case as the first registration is cancelled) , but be cup tied with the resigned club - so perhaps it is always on the safe side to check.
When a club resigns, it is the results that are expunged - not the fact that games have taken place - players who have appeared in those games or even committed a discipline offence in those games will still have that fact recorded against them.
| |
|
| |
Gordon Premiership Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Wed 16 Nov 2011, 9:42 am | |
| It's a simple game?
If in doubt - ask. | |
|
| |
BEES KNEES
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Wed 16 Nov 2011, 10:29 am | |
| - ShaNiO wrote:
- KAJI-MACHINE wrote:
- a few might have coursework to get done you never know??!!haha
we shall see at the end of the season when your looking up the table at us never know kid u havent shook us off yet!! | |
|
| |
Polska legend II Supreme Top Dog
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Wed 16 Nov 2011, 9:19 pm | |
| so our new signing (who played in the Arthur Moore) cannot now play in the Foster? | |
|
| |
Stroller Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Thu 17 Nov 2011, 8:07 am | |
| - Polska legend II wrote:
- so our new signing (who played in the Arthur Moore) cannot now play in the Foster?
Afraid so. Apparently you can go up from Stokes to Foster to Arthur Moore but not down, bit odd really | |
|
| |
Aussie Owl Super Premier Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Thu 17 Nov 2011, 9:24 am | |
| - Stroller wrote:
- Polska legend II wrote:
- so our new signing (who played in the Arthur Moore) cannot now play in the Foster?
Afraid so. Apparently you can go up from Stokes to Foster to Arthur Moore but not down, bit odd really ....... but only when moving to a more senior team in the same club. If you have played in one of these three cups for one team, you cannot then play for another club in any of these three competitions. This applies even if your original club has since resigned. | |
|
| |
WILKSY
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Thu 17 Nov 2011, 10:32 am | |
| - Jwithers wrote:
- NPE's manager signed the orange form and said it would be alright..... we are a new team and so is are secutary we did not no we would be kicked out for it :s
never said it was ok pal, think u need ur head looking at. yea i signed it but didnt no myself! to be honest yea u beat us and maybe we should be out but rules are rules. | |
|
| |
Jwithers
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Thu 17 Nov 2011, 1:29 pm | |
| - WILKSY wrote:
- Jwithers wrote:
- NPE's manager signed the orange form and said it would be alright..... we are a new team and so is are secutary we did not no we would be kicked out for it :s
never said it was ok pal, think u need ur head looking at. yea i signed it but didnt no myself! to be honest yea u beat us and maybe we should be out but rules are rules. LIESSSS i dont think i need my head looking at i only said you said it was alright :L haha | |
|
| |
rocket ledge Non-League Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Thu 17 Nov 2011, 2:25 pm | |
| right snidy boy that wilksy, bang out of order there lol | |
|
| |
WILKSY
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Fri 18 Nov 2011, 9:46 am | |
| ur full off sh!t, i wouldnt of signed the form if i knew | |
|
| |
Hairy Hebrew! Division 1 Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Fri 18 Nov 2011, 10:01 am | |
| - WILKSY wrote:
- ur full off sh!t, i wouldnt of signed the form if i knew
I wud of :$ | |
|
| |
Hairy Hebrew! Division 1 Poster
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Fri 18 Nov 2011, 10:05 am | |
| At the end of the day it's up to the Secretary of the team signing the player on to find out. just ask, thats wat the league officers r there for | |
|
| |
Polska legend II Supreme Top Dog
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Fri 18 Nov 2011, 12:27 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Jwithers
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks Fri 18 Nov 2011, 1:52 pm | |
| you can do it in the league we just though it would be the same for cups. stupid rule if you ask me. language wilksy im offended by that kick em out the cup :O haha | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: kajima v st marks | |
| |
|
| |
| kajima v st marks | |
|