Team of the Month August / September

Cheating?? Haha

Hairy Hebrew! wrote:

Cheating?? Haha

division 2 team with the players oak have got this year!

I seem to remember you saying we was only a 3 player team! Surely a 3 player team doesnt justify a quadruple promotion does it?

Widds wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Well done to frolesworth, but should of been foxes for me as div 1 tough division an I fink anyone can beat anyone in that division this year, be very tight by end of season! as for frolesworth winning it, bit unfair as they have dropped about 2 (do speak the truth)...divisions from prem with most of same players...

glad someone said it! Fair play to them seeing thru last season in the prem, but a two division drop is bollocks

Can we try to keep the language down please, my nanna reads this, she's just spat her false teeth in her porridge.


Seriously though, i'm begining to feel sorry for frolesworth, it just looks like you are a bunch of sore losers with comments like these.

Hairy Hebrew! wrote:

I seem to remember you saying we was only a 3 player team! Surely a 3 player team doesnt justify a quadruple promotion does it?

Now the royal oak pub has closed down is it true use will be called allexton oak next year? As that's 4 allexton senior league players you have sighned on playing in division 5??? Fair play to your players for attracting another to come an join use! Use will walk that division.

BULLIT wrote:

Hairy Hebrew! wrote:

I seem to remember you saying we was only a 3 player team! Surely a 3 player team doesnt justify a quadruple promotion does it?

Now the royal oak pub has closed down is it true use will be called allexton oak next year? As that's 4 allexton senior league players you have sighned on playing in division 5??? Fair play to your players for attracting another to come an join use! Use will walk that division.

For one thing we are in division 4 so please dont be mistaken. As for our name, well 4 out of 20-25 players doesnt justify us changing our name. That would be rather silly now wouldnt it? Why the fascination in us if you dont mind me asking?

Hairy Hebrew! wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Hairy Hebrew! wrote:

I seem to remember you saying we was only a 3 player team! Surely a 3 player team doesnt justify a quadruple promotion does it?

Now the royal oak pub has closed down is it true use will be called allexton oak next year? As that's 4 allexton senior league players you have sighned on playing in division 5??? Fair play to your players for attracting another to come an join use! Use will walk that division.

For one thing we are in division 4 so please dont be mistaken. As for our name, well 4 out of 20-25 players doesnt justify us changing our name. That would be rather silly now wouldnt it? Why the fascination in us if you dont mind me asking?

Just stating fact! plus I was just actually stating that use should of not won team of the month anyway as use will win most, if not all your games this year with the players and squad the oak have. that ok with you? If not I will leave you a chew chew for sundays game. good luck for rest of season

Am i right in saying frowlsworth signed alot of the enderby players????

BULLIT wrote:

Royal oak cheating aswell in that division with the players they got. have atleast 7-8 players could play a lot higher.

Why would they be cheating???

Bucko wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Royal oak cheating aswell in that division with the players they got. have atleast 7-8 players could play a lot higher.

Why would they be cheating???

far to many good players in there squad for division 4. That's just my opinion

Glad they aint seen ours

Bucko wrote:

Am i right in saying frowlsworth signed alot of the enderby players????

You are right wich is also showing in there results.

Its alright having the squad its getting them out of bed on a sunday morning

Polingtons wrote:

Its alright having the squad its getting them out of bed on a sunday morning

haha. how do you think car breakers felt? Had the players sighned on, but could not not get them out of bed either every week  

BULLIT wrote:

Bucko wrote:

Am i right in saying frowlsworth signed alot of the enderby players????

You are right wich is also showing in there results.

Enderby that cudnt hack the premier so they folded, so for me they did not deserve team of the month

Bucko wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Bucko wrote:

Am i right in saying frowlsworth signed alot of the enderby players????

You are right wich is also showing in there results.

Enderby that cudnt hack the premier so they folded, so for me they did not deserve team of the month

Correct bucko

BULLIT wrote:

Bucko wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Royal oak cheating aswell in that division with the players they got. have atleast 7-8 players could play a lot higher.

Why would they be cheating???

far to many good players in there squad for division 4. That's just my opinion

Thats fair enuf mate but they did go up 2 divisions so needed to strengthen the fact they cud attract the players they have is fair play to them so hard to call them cheats

Well seeings you called us a very average team last season and only had 3 players. Now sudeenly we have 7-8 players that shudnt be playing div 4? But they were ok for div 6?? I think you are not only confusing the forum but also yourself yet again

Bucko wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Bucko wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Royal oak cheating aswell in that division with the players they got. have atleast 7-8 players could play a lot higher.

Why would they be cheating???

far to many good players in there squad for division 4. That's just my opinion

Thats fair enuf mate but they did go up 2 divisions so needed to strengthen the fact they cud attract the players they have is fair play to them so hard to call them cheats

Ok bit harsh to cheats, But new he would bight:lol: 

Oh your such a tease arent you!

Hairy Hebrew! wrote:

Well seeings you called us a very average team last season and only had 3 players. Now sudeenly we have 7-8 players that shudnt be playing div 4? But they were ok for div 6?? I think you are not only confusing the forum but also yourself yet again

You still are average don't confuse yourself, just still in wrong division for the players oak have! Like to see use few more divisions higher. Look at ur results this year and who against. not many teams will cope with use boys.

Hairy Hebrew! wrote:

Please stop contradicting yourself!  Your making me go cross eyed! We are going a long just fine for now thank you. We only bought 2 new lads in so hardly a massive revamp now is it

Ok cock-eyes. bye bye

Hellboy wrote:

Widds wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Well done to frolesworth, but should of been foxes for me as div 1 tough division an I fink anyone can beat anyone in that division this year, be very tight by end of season! as for frolesworth winning it, bit unfair as they have dropped about 2 (do speak the truth)...divisions from prem with most of same players...

glad someone said it! Fair play to them seeing thru last season in the prem, but a two division drop is bollocks

Can we try to keep the language down please, my nanna reads this, she's just spat her false teeth in her porridge.


Seriously though, i'm begining to feel sorry for frolesworth, it just looks like you are a bunch of sore losers with comments like these.

apologies for the bad language, no need. But yes, i am bitter when i see teams like prem sports and frolesworth get moved down. One after winning a cup and one moved down two divisions, because they lost players, however when NRI lost about ten players in our last season, after getting battered most weeks, we were ignored. Just left a sour taste! But back on subject, frolesworth - massive respect to them for carrying on thru bad times last season, but to move down two divisions, and bring in some Enderby players, that's not team of the month material!

Hairy Hebrew! wrote:

Oh your such a tease arent you!

Jealous me thinks, his small mind cant comprehend your greatness. 

BULLIT wrote:

Bucko wrote:

Am i right in saying frowlsworth signed alot of the enderby players????

You are right wich is also showing in there results.

We signed ONE Enderby player.

Get your facts right.

FEAR_FUFC wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Bucko wrote:

Am i right in saying frowlsworth signed alot of the enderby players????

You are right wich is also showing in there results.

We signed ONE Enderby player.

Get your facts right.

I bet bullit tells everyone he's got a 9"cher.

Hellboy wrote:

FEAR_FUFC wrote:

BULLIT wrote:

Bucko wrote:

Am i right in saying frowlsworth signed alot of the enderby players????

You are right wich is also showing in there results.

We signed ONE Enderby player.

Get your facts right.

I bet bullit tells everyone he's got a 9"cher.

I bet hellboy tells his mum he spies in the showers after the games still

Oh deary me, still not getting your facts right.

FEAR is telling the truth, Frolesworth have only signed one Enderby player, and only a few of last season's team have returned, they've got most of their players from Lutterworth Athletic senior side, 6-7 lads left when the club moved from the Midlands Counties into the UCL, couldn't be arsed with the increased travelling, so for now they've joined Frolesworth sundays, to get there football fix,

Div 2 isn't where they should be with the squad they've got, but they didnt sign the disgruntled Lutterworth lads til the division had already been decided

I want to know what its got to do with a suppository named person.

BeepBeep wrote:

FEAR is telling the truth, Frolesworth have only signed one Enderby player, and only a few of last season's team have returned, they've got most of their players from Lutterworth Athletic senior side, 6-7 lads left when the club moved from the Midlands Counties into the UCL, couldn't be arsed with the increased travelling, so for now they've joined Frolesworth sundays, to get there football fix,

Div 2 isn't where they should be with the squad they've got, but they didnt sign the disgruntled Lutterworth lads til the division had already been decided

Whilst the majority of that statement is true, it is worth noticing that we only have signed one player who hasn't represented our club before. Many of the players in question have become disillusioned with management and other factors at Lutterworth Athletic and now only play on Sundays.

Following last season, where many clubs would have folded (we have already seen two this season), one particular individual who now lives and works in London, worked tirelessly to turn around a £600 debt, acquire a new ground after Lutterworth Town agreed to play at Dunley Way, a new sponsorship to pay for a much needed new kit and sign a squad that was not only competitive, but also more importantly, reliable.

These factors, in addition to our strong start to the season, are obviously the reason for us winning team of the month.

I think the alliance should employ one person, a tzar, lets say someone like me, to keep an eye on all lower division players, just to make sure anyone who is playing above their level, get removed from said divisions and made to play in the correct one, based upon skills and talent, it would'nt be very hard to weedle out the starletts and bring them to book, let me get at them and show them who's boss.

I wouldn't charge too much, even though i know the alliance is draped in gold.

Giving away all these new match balls willy nilly, talk about splashing the cash, it must be so nice to have so much money.

congratulations to Frolesworth, many teams would have thrown in the towel last season but they struggled through and have rebuilt, fair play to them and they deserve some success this season, there were other teams that also would of made worthy winners too but there can only be 1 winner.

hellboy u sound like the disgruntled kid who never got picked to play footy at school !!

Fair play to froleworth for winning team of the month , if there all friends and play for the same club wot is the problem ?? just means other sides need to raise their game

Do u really think we would have as many teams on a Sunday morning if some idiot like u went round scouting for better players to play in the prem n div 1 ?? how many players would quit Sunday mornings as all they want to do is have a kick around n bit of banter with their mates after a heavy sat night and to get back on it sunday afternoon !!!

Wow what an exciting life you live, its a good job the pothunters are there to keep your team afloat, lets see if you're still going in 5 years time, and then i might just give you a big pat on your big ugly head.

Hellboy wrote:

Wow what an exciting life you live, its a good job the pothunters are there to keep your team afloat, lets see if you're still going in 5 years time, and then i might just give you a big pat on your big ugly head.

pothunters ?? your just jealous cause were doin well , no doubt when we loose u will jump straight on here having a go at us !! people said the monsell magpies would never see 5 years together but we proved all the haters wrong and lks will do the same so see u in 5 years hellboy if nobodys throttled ya by then that is ;-)

Caught me a big ugly catfish here.

love all the hate u have for us , least your leaving other sides alone now

LKS gaffer wrote:

love all the hate u have for us , least your leaving other sides alone now

Not on your nelly.