Are you a Registered User?

If you are a registered user but not making any posts, why not? It really is good fun if you join in.

We have 1164 registered users which is fantastic and the envy of many others, but 441 have not made a post.

If you have registered but have changed your email address or have some other difficulty, just send Aussie Owl a PM and we will try to get you started.

come and join the debate. you too could be discussing the relevant topics of the day with such luminaries as Hellboy or chewing the fat with Greeedy

After seeing some posts over the past couple of months its no surprise many people dont bother though......

Keep your chins up biggins.

Admin wrote:

If you are a registered user but not making any posts, why not? It really is good fun if you join in.

Keep consistent and people might. You have your favorites who are allowed to abuse without warning/suspension but you suspend others for posting far less abuse than your favorites.

Try and make it work both ways, some like to dish it out but can't take it, cry off throwing hissy fits and deleting their accounts etc. (just an example) but on the other hand threaten others (just an example).

Make your mind up.

Don't agree. If its offensive, its offensive.

Fair shout, but be consistent.

Something will be offensive to someone all of the time - who's to say what is and what isn't, I don't get offeneded - people get frustrated becuase they get suspended for somethinig far worse than the favorites on here.

Also, people such as Kev can post an opinion of a ref (quite rightly so), but others get their posts removed at the slightest hint of controversy.

Be consistent.

Quote :

Also, people such as Kev can post an opinion of a ref (quite rightly so), but others get their posts removed at the slightest hint of controversy.

Be consistent.

It got deleted and I got reprimanded, I have a PM from Dennis to prove it, then after that all subsequent cristism of the referee got deleted in which I reposted it in defiance.

I had one line removed sunday as well and an email from Dennis, think there is consistancy there

I went on...

Magna 73 Sec wrote:

...you took advantage of a very weak referee

Do you not think that your 5th goal was a blatant foul? I agree our peno was soft but that just shows how incompetent the referee was

Magna 73 Sec wrote:

OK the facts, ref was awful...

Magna 73 Sec wrote:

I was so angry that the referee did nothing to protect us from some of your tackles and I was slightly shocked by it...

I'm with you thouh, if a ref is poor then why aren't you allowed to say so?

I definately said it as you prove but I posted far worse which got removed

Which just proves my/our point...

We're either allowed to post about refs or not.



Be consistent.

Whistle Blower wrote:

Also, people such as Kev can post an opinion of a ref (quite rightly so), but others get their posts removed at the slightest hint of controversy.

Be consistent.

im sure most posts absolutely slating refs are removed. but if it is something like 'the ref was poor' it will be left on

year after year people come on here slating refs, and I would expect most if not all to be removed. everyone knows by now that if you are not happy with a refs performance then you go through the appropriate channels, which is not on here.

and I still don't think there are any favourites

Trust one of the favourites to come out with something like that....


Totally got to agree about your ref statement, there is a proceedure, and its not on a forum.

ive never been anyones favourite...

just a hunch...

To whistleblower - I agree....was quite surprised i didnt get a warning a few weeks ago, you made a comment about my mother which i thought was out of order, but i responded in an over the top manner. Should have had a warning and probably been suspended, but then again, also to whistleblower, you seem to constantly send abuse in my direction, even in the posts above, so maybe you should be suspended again? I am quite happy to wipe the slate clean, let bygones be bygones and all that....but i am sure you will just send another insult in my direction....

Widds wrote:

To whistleblower - I agree....was quite surprised i didnt get a warning a few weeks ago, you made a comment about my mother which i thought was out of order, but i responded in an over the top manner. Should have had a warning and probably been suspended, but then again, also to whistleblower, you seem to constantly send abuse in my direction, even in the posts above, so maybe you should be suspended again? I am quite happy to wipe the slate clean, let bygones be bygones and all that....but i am sure you will just send another insult in my direction....

i had almost the same comment from bad tekkers last week the post was removed i assume he had a warning but if i had replied to it as i wanted to i,m sure i would have been suspended
people can say what they like about me on this forum and i will give it back.but any mention of the persons family is not on and should always warrant a suspension
right off my soap box now!

To prevent further offensive and off topic postings, this thread is now closed.